0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£ÇлýÀÌ Áö°¢ÇÑ ¼ö°£È£»çÀÇ ¸®´õ½±°ú ÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ¿ÍÀÇ °ü°è ¿¬±¸

A Study on the Relationship between Head Nurse¢¥s Leadership perceived by Student and Student¢¥s Satisfaction in Clinical Nursing Practice

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 1994³â 6±Ç 2È£ p.144 ~ 155
KMID : 0367019940060020144
°­ÀÍÈ­ (  ) - °æ±âÀü¹®´ëÇÐ

±èÇý¼ø (  ) - °æ±âÀü¹®´ëÇÐ

Abstract

This study attempted to improve nursing student¢¥s clinical practice through analyzing the relationship between head nurse¢¥s leadership perceived by student and student¢¥s satisfaction in clinical nursing practice.
Study subjects are 402 sophomore and Junior nursing students of two Junior Nursing Colleges.
Data collection took place from September 5th in 1994 to September 15th in 1994.
Collected data was analyzed by study objectives by using statistical test of Ttest, Anova,Multiple regression and the study results are follows.
1. Student¢¥s total satisfaction score of clinical practice was low as a mean score of 2 73. Satisfaction scores devided by 5 categories revealed following orders : Time(2.88), Content(2.86), Environment (2.74) and Instruction(2.36).
2. Of the 29 total items of clinical practice satisfaction, category of content in which item of "clinical practice give new experiences followed Kyoungki Junior Collegelearning of class lecture" shwed the most high score(3.40) and item of "clinical practice repeats simple technical work"showed the most low score (2.08).
3. The analysis of factors which influence clinical practice showed no significant relationship(P> 0.005) among the factors of school grade,religion,value of nursing occupation. However following items such as content and scope of clinical practice, relationship of costudent, patient recognition of nursing student,society recognition of nursing action showed statistically significant relationships (P < 0. 005 ).
4. The relationship between head nurse¢¥s leader-ship and clinical practice satis faction showed significant correlation(Pearson¢¥s R=.393, P=. 000).
The relationship between head nurse¢¥s person oriented leadership and clinical practice instruction showed significant correlation (r =. 560, P =. 000), but clinical practice hours(r=.258), con-tent (r=. 248), environment (r =. 183) and evaluation (r=.164) showed weak correlation.
5. Head nurse¢¥s person oriented leadership showed more satisfaction of clinical practice than task oriented leadership.
6. The variables which influence clinical practice satisfaction explained following orders by the stepwise multiple regression : content and scope of clinical practice (16.401o), head nurse¢¥s person oriented leadership (27.51%), patient recognition of nursing student (31.30%), practical work (33.31%) (p<0.05).
KeyWords
¼ö°£È£»çÀÇ ¸®´õ½±, ÀÓ»ó½Ç½À¸¸Á·µµ
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed